linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/35] brcmfmac: acpi: Add support for fetching Apple ACPI properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 4 Jan 2022 20:00:51 +0900
From:   Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To:     Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
        Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
        Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
        Chi-hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ineon.com>,
        Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ineon.com>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@...adcom.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
        "brian m. carlson" <sandals@...stytoothpaste.net>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
        SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/35] brcmfmac: acpi: Add support for fetching Apple
 ACPI properties

On 2022/01/04 19:21, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 1/4/2022 8:26 AM, Hector Martin wrote:
>> On DT platforms, the module-instance and antenna-sku-info properties
>> are passed in the DT. On ACPI platforms, module-instance is passed via
>> the analogous Apple device property mechanism, while the antenna SKU
>> info is instead obtained via an ACPI method that grabs it from
>> non-volatile storage.
>>
>> Add support for this, to allow proper firmware selection on Apple
>> platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
>> ---
>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/Makefile      |  2 +
>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/acpi.c        | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c      |  1 +
>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.h      |  9 ++++
>>   4 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/acpi.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/Makefile b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/Makefile
>> index 13c13504a6e8..19009eb9db93 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/Makefile
>> @@ -47,3 +47,5 @@ brcmfmac-$(CONFIG_OF) += \
>>   		of.o
>>   brcmfmac-$(CONFIG_DMI) += \
>>   		dmi.o
>> +brcmfmac-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += \
>> +		acpi.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/acpi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/acpi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2b1a4448b291
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/acpi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: ISC
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright The Asahi Linux Contributors
>> + */
> 
> Common format for copyright statement (in this folder) seems to be:
> 
> Copyright (c) <YEAR> <COPYRIGHT_HOLDER>
> 
> Regards,
> Arend

I get this every time I submit a patch to a new subsystem :-)

This is based on this best practice:

https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/copyright-notices-in-open-source-software-projects/

Basically, the year format quickly becomes outdated and is rather
useless, and listing specific names also ends up missing every
subsequent contributor, so more general copyright statements work better
for this kind of use case. In the end we all know git history is the
proper record of copyright status.

I don't have a super strong opinion here, but we've been trying to
standardize on this format for contributions coming from our subproject,
and it feels more useful than a random contributor's name with a date 5
years in the past :)

-- 
Hector Martin (marcan@...can.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub