[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220104132026.3062763-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:20:24 +0100
From: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Change flexcan features at runtime
This series was born from the review https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/1/2/127
by Marc Kleine-Budde. The ethtool module is minimal and lacks the
callback to change the setting at runtime (this has yet to be defined).
I'm certainly not an expert but might it make sense to use the
set_features() callback? Although I understand that it belongs to
`struct net_device_ops' and not to 'struct ethtool_ops'.
Dario Binacchi (2):
can: flexcan: allow to change quirks at runtime
can: flexcan: add ethtool support
drivers/net/can/Makefile | 3 +
drivers/net/can/flexcan.h | 107 +++++++++++++
drivers/net/can/flexcan_ethtool.c | 29 ++++
drivers/net/can/{flexcan.c => flexcan_main.c} | 144 ++++--------------
4 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/flexcan.h
create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/flexcan_ethtool.c
rename drivers/net/can/{flexcan.c => flexcan_main.c} (92%)
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists