[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03a8fcbe-4f35-757a-b3f6-b3fdaa22966c@foss.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:15:27 +0000
From: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@...s.arm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
mike.leach@...aro.org, inux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] perf test: Add beginning of test infra + test to
exercise coresight
On 12/21/21 20:40, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:03:49PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 04:03:55PM +0000, carsten.haitzler@...s.arm.com wrote:
>>> From: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@....com>
>>>
>>> This adds the initial test harness to run perf record and examine the
>>> resuling output when coresight is enabled on arm64 and check the
>>> resulting quality of the output as part of perf test.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@....com>
>>> ---
>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 +
>>> tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 14 +-
>>> .../tests/shell/coresight_asm_pure_loop.sh | 18 +++
>>> tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/coresight.sh | 130 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/Makefile | 26 ++++
>>> .../perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/Makefile | 27 ++++
>>> .../shell/tools/coresight/Makefile.miniconfig | 23 ++++
>>> .../tools/coresight/asm_pure_loop/Makefile | 30 ++++
>>> .../coresight/asm_pure_loop/asm_pure_loop.S | 28 ++++
>>> 9 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/coresight_asm_pure_loop.sh
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/coresight.sh
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/Makefile
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/Makefile
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/Makefile.miniconfig
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/asm_pure_loop/Makefile
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/asm_pure_loop/asm_pure_loop.S
>>
>> The folder naming is okay for me, but it is cyclic with the format:
>> "tools/.../tools/". So I am wandering if below two pathes are better?
>>
>> tools/perf/tests/shell/prog/coresight/
>> or
>> tools/perf/tests/shell/coresight/
>
> The later, its descriptive enough, I think, and the shortest variant so
> far.
Sure - no problem. I can change that. Once no one has any more comments
and a few of the pending thnigs I've marked to resolve are solved, I'll
submit a new patch set.
> - Arnaldo
>
>> I'd like to leave this question for Arnaldo / Jiri for the folder
>> layout.
>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 13f9a84a617e..d46e8469c467 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -1894,6 +1894,9 @@ F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
>>> F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
>>> F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.h
>>> F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c
>>> +F: tools/perf/tests/shell/coresight_*
>>> +F: tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/Makefile
>>> +F: tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/*
>>> F: tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/*
>>> F: tools/perf/util/cs-etm.*
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
>>> index 80522bcfafe0..26467a2c71f4 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
>>> @@ -630,7 +630,15 @@ sync_file_range_tbls := $(srctree)/tools/perf/trace/beauty/sync_file_range.sh
>>> $(sync_file_range_arrays): $(linux_uapi_dir)/fs.h $(sync_file_range_tbls)
>>> $(Q)$(SHELL) '$(sync_file_range_tbls)' $(linux_uapi_dir) > $@
>>>
>>> -all: shell_compatibility_test $(ALL_PROGRAMS) $(LANG_BINDINGS) $(OTHER_PROGRAMS)
>>> +TESTS_TOOLS_DIR := $(srctree)/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools
>>> +
>>> +tests-tools-targets: FORCE
>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(TESTS_TOOLS_DIR)
>>> +
>>> +tests-tools-targets-clean:
>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(TESTS_TOOLS_DIR) clean
>>> +
>>> +all: shell_compatibility_test $(ALL_PROGRAMS) $(LANG_BINDINGS) $(OTHER_PROGRAMS) tests-tools-targets
>>>
>>> # Create python binding output directory if not already present
>>> _dummy := $(shell [ -d '$(OUTPUT)python' ] || mkdir -p '$(OUTPUT)python')
>>> @@ -1020,6 +1028,7 @@ install-tests: all install-gtk
>>> $(INSTALL) tests/shell/*.sh '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell'; \
>>> $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell/lib'; \
>>> $(INSTALL) tests/shell/lib/*.sh '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell/lib'
>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C tests/shell/tools install-tests
>>>
>>> install-bin: install-tools install-tests install-traceevent-plugins
>>>
>>> @@ -1088,7 +1097,7 @@ endif # BUILD_BPF_SKEL
>>> bpf-skel-clean:
>>> $(call QUIET_CLEAN, bpf-skel) $(RM) -r $(SKEL_TMP_OUT) $(SKELETONS)
>>>
>>> -clean:: $(LIBTRACEEVENT)-clean $(LIBAPI)-clean $(LIBBPF)-clean $(LIBSUBCMD)-clean $(LIBPERF)-clean fixdep-clean python-clean bpf-skel-clean
>>> +clean:: $(LIBTRACEEVENT)-clean $(LIBAPI)-clean $(LIBBPF)-clean $(LIBSUBCMD)-clean $(LIBPERF)-clean fixdep-clean python-clean bpf-skel-clean tests-tools-targets-clean
>>> $(call QUIET_CLEAN, core-objs) $(RM) $(LIBPERF_A) $(OUTPUT)perf-archive $(OUTPUT)perf-with-kcore $(OUTPUT)perf-iostat $(LANG_BINDINGS)
>>> $(Q)find $(if $(OUTPUT),$(OUTPUT),.) -name '*.o' -delete -o -name '\.*.cmd' -delete -o -name '\.*.d' -delete
>>> $(Q)$(RM) $(OUTPUT).config-detected
>>> @@ -1155,5 +1164,6 @@ FORCE:
>>> .PHONY: shell_compatibility_test please_set_SHELL_PATH_to_a_more_modern_shell
>>> .PHONY: $(GIT-HEAD-PHONY) TAGS tags cscope FORCE prepare
>>> .PHONY: libtraceevent_plugins archheaders
>>> +.PHONY: $(TESTS_TOOLS_TARGETS)
>>>
>>> endif # force_fixdep
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/coresight_asm_pure_loop.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/coresight_asm_pure_loop.sh
>>> new file mode 100755
>>> index 000000000000..542d4a37e349
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/coresight_asm_pure_loop.sh
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>>> +#!/bin/sh -e
>>> +# Coresight / ASM Pure Loop
>>> +
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +# Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@....com>, 2021
>>> +
>>> +TEST="asm_pure_loop"
>>> +. $(dirname $0)/lib/coresight.sh
>>> +ARGS=""
>>> +DATV="out"
>>> +DATA="$DATD/perf-$TEST-$DATV.data"
>>> +
>>> +perf record $PERFRECOPT -o "$DATA" "$BIN" $ARGS
>>
>> Is $ARGS redundant and can be removed?
>>
>>> +perf_dump_aux_verify "$DATA" 2601 334 334
>>
>> These three magic numbers "2601 334 334" would be hard to understand.
>> One way is the code can dynamically calculate these values based on the
>> loop times (the loop is is predefined in asm_pure_loop.S), or it's
>> good to give explanation in comments for these values.
>>
>>> +
>>> +err=$?
>>> +exit $err
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/coresight.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/coresight.sh
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..cd6c1283e6f5
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/coresight.sh
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +# Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@....com>, 2021
>>> +
>>> +# This is sourced from a driver script so no need for #!/bin... etc. at the
>>> +# top - the assumption below is that it runs as part of sourcing after the
>>> +# test sets up some basic env vars to say what it is.
>>> +
>>> +# perf record options for the perf tests to use
>>> +PERFRECMEM="-m ,128M"
>>
>> We must use 128Mb for the AUX trace buffer? The big buffer size is
>> not friendly for embedded system.
>>
>>> +PERFRECOPT="$PERFRECMEM -e cs_etm//u"
>>> +
>>> +# These tests need to be run as root or coresight won't allow large buffers
>>> +# and will not collect proper data
>>> +UID=`id -u`
>>> +if test "$UID" -ne 0; then
>>> + echo "Not running as root... skip"
>>> + exit 2
>>> +fi
>>> +
>>> +TOOLS=$(dirname $0)/tools
>>> +DIR="$TOOLS/coresight/$TEST"
>>> +BIN="$DIR/$TEST"
>>> +# If the test tool/binary does not exist and is executable then skip the test
>>> +if ! test -x "$BIN"; then exit 2; fi
>>> +DATD="."
>>
>> It's blur to set DATD and STATD to ".". If the user doesn't specify
>> the envs, it's not clear it will point to which folder.
>>
>>> +# If the data dir env is set then make the data dir use that instead of ./
>>> +if test -n "$PERF_TEST_CORESIGHT_DATADIR"; then
>>> + DATD="$PERF_TEST_CORESIGHT_DATADIR";
>>> +fi
>>> +# If the stat dir env is set then make the data dir use that instead of ./
>>> +STATD="."
>>> +if test -n "$PERF_TEST_CORESIGHT_STATDIR"; then
>>> + STATD="$PERF_TEST_CORESIGHT_STATDIR";
>>> +fi
>>> +
>>> +# Called if the test fails - error code 2
>>> +err() {
>>> + echo "$1"
>>> + exit 1
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +# Check that some statistics from our perf
>>> +check_val_min() {
>>> + STATF="$4"
>>> + if test "$2" -lt "$3"; then
>>> + echo ", FAILED" >> "$STATF"
>>> + err "Sanity check number of $1 is too low ($2 < $3)"
>>> + fi
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +perf_dump_aux_verify() {
>>> + # Some basic checking that the AUX chunk contains some sensible data
>>> + # to see that we are recording something and at least a minimum
>>> + # amount of it. We should almost always see F3 atoms in just about
>>> + # anything but certainly we will see some trace info and async atom
>>> + # chunks.
>>> + DUMP="$DATD/perf-tmp-aux-dump.txt"
>>> + perf report --stdio --dump -i "$1" | \
>>> + grep -o -e I_ATOM_F3 -e I_ASYNC -e I_TRACE_INFO > "$DUMP"
>>> + # Simply count how many of these atoms we find to see that we are
>>> + # producing a reasonable amount of data - exact checks are not sane
>>> + # as this is a lossy process where we may lose some blocks and the
>>> + # compiler may produce different code depending on the compiler and
>>> + # optimization options, so this is rough just to see if we're
>>> + # either missing almost all the data or all of it
>>> + ATOM_F3_NUM=`grep I_ATOM_F3 "$DUMP" | wc -l`
>>> + ATOM_ASYNC_NUM=`grep I_ASYNC "$DUMP" | wc -l`
>>> + ATOM_TRACE_INFO_NUM=`grep I_TRACE_INFO "$DUMP" | wc -l`
>>> + rm -f "$DUMP"
>>> +
>>> + # Arguments provide minimums for a pass
>>> + CHECK_F3_MIN="$2"
>>> + CHECK_ASYNC_MIN="$3"
>>> + CHECK_TRACE_INFO_MIN="$4"
>>> +
>>> + # Write out statistics, so over time you can track results to see if
>>> + # there is a pattern - for example we have less "noisy" results that
>>> + # produce more consistent amounts of data each run, to see if over
>>> + # time any techinques to minimize data loss are having an effect or
>>> + # not
>>> + STATF="$STATD/stats-$TEST-$DATV.csv"
>>> + if ! test -f "$STATF"; then
>>> + echo "ATOM F3 Count, Minimum, ATOM ASYNC Count, Minimum, TRACE INFO Count, Minimum" > "$STATF"
>>> + fi
>>> + echo -n "$ATOM_F3_NUM, $CHECK_F3_MIN, $ATOM_ASYNC_NUM, $CHECK_ASYNC_MIN, $ATOM_TRACE_INFO_NUM, $CHECK_TRACE_INFO_MIN" >> "$STATF"
>>> +
>>> + # Actually check to see if we passed or failed.
>>> + check_val_min "ATOM_F3" "$ATOM_F3_NUM" "$CHECK_F3_MIN" "$STATF"
>>> + check_val_min "ASYNC" "$ATOM_ASYNC_NUM" "$CHECK_ASYNC_MIN" "$STATF"
>>> + check_val_min "TRACE_INFO" "$ATOM_TRACE_INFO_NUM" "$CHECK_TRACE_INFO_MIN" "$STATF"
>>> + echo ", Ok" >> "$STATF"
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +perf_dump_aux_tid_verify() {
>>
>> This function is not used in the test contained in this patch.
>>
>>> + # Specifically crafted test will produce a list of Tread ID's to
>>> + # stdout that need to be checked to see that they have had trace
>>> + # info collected in AUX blocks in the perf data. This will go
>>> + # through all the TID's that are listed as CID=0xabcdef and see
>>> + # that all the Thread IDs the test tool reports are in the perf
>>> + # data AUX chunks
>>> +
>>> + # The TID test tools will print a TID per stdout line that are being
>>> + # tested
>>> + TIDS=`cat "$2"`
>>> + # Scan the perf report to find the TIDs that are actually CID in hex
>>> + # and build a list of the ones found
>>> + FOUND_TIDS=`perf report --stdio --dump -i "$1" | \
>>> + grep -o "CID=0x[0-9a-z]\+" | sed 's/CID=//g' | \
>>> + uniq | sort | uniq`
>>> +
>>> + # Iterate over the list of TIDs that the test says it has and find
>>> + # them in the TIDs found in the perf report
>>> + MISSING=""
>>> + for TID2 in $TIDS; do
>>> + FOUND=""
>>> + for TIDHEX in $FOUND_TIDS; do
>>> + TID=`printf "%i" $TIDHEX`
>>> + if test "$TID" -eq "$TID2"; then
>>> + FOUND="y"
>>> + break
>>> + fi
>>> + done
>>> + if test -z "$FOUND"; then
>>> + MISSING="$MISSING $TID"
>>> + fi
>>> + done
>>> + if test -n "$MISSING"; then
>>> + err "Thread IDs $MISSING not found in perf AUX data"
>>> + fi
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/Makefile b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/Makefile
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..c7ada20922fd
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/Makefile
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>> +# Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@....com>, 2021
>>> +include ../../../../../tools/scripts/Makefile.include
>>> +include ../../../../../tools/scripts/Makefile.arch
>>> +include ../../../../../tools/scripts/utilities.mak
>>
>> To be honest, I don't understand well for perf's build and config
>> system. Seems to me, a good example for building program is jevents.
>>
>> Please take a look for the code:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/Makefile.perf#n667
>>
>> If follow the same method with jevents for building test programs,
>> I can see one benefit is we don't need to create a Makefile, on the
>> other hand, we can reuse the perf's build system and simply create a
>> Build file under the folder tools/perf/tests/shell/.../coresight/.
>>
>>> +
>>> +SUBDIRS = \
>>> + coresight
>>> +
>>> +all: $(SUBDIRS)
>>> +$(SUBDIRS):
>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $@
>>> +
>>> +INSTALLDIRS = $(SUBDIRS:%=install-%)
>>> +
>>> +install-tests: all $(INSTALLDIRS)
>>> +$(INSTALLDIRS):
>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(@:install-%=%) install-tests
>>> +
>>> +CLEANDIRS = $(SUBDIRS:%=clean-%)
>>> +
>>> +clean: $(CLEANDIRS)
>>> +$(CLEANDIRS):
>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(@:clean-%=%) O=$(OUTPUT) clean >/dev/null
>>> +
>>> +.PHONY: all clean install-tests $(SUBDIRS) $(CLEANDIRS) $(INSTALLDIRS)
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/Makefile b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/Makefile
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..723006ea827c
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/Makefile
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>> +# Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@....com>, 2021
>>> +include ../../../../../../tools/scripts/Makefile.include
>>> +include ../../../../../../tools/scripts/Makefile.arch
>>> +include ../../../../../../tools/scripts/utilities.mak
>>> +
>>> +SUBDIRS = \
>>> + asm_pure_loop
>>> +
>>> +all: $(SUBDIRS)
>>> +$(SUBDIRS):
>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $@
>>> +
>>> +INSTALLDIRS = $(SUBDIRS:%=install-%)
>>> +
>>> +install-tests: $(INSTALLDIRS)
>>> +$(INSTALLDIRS):
>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(@:install-%=%) install-tests
>>> +
>>> +CLEANDIRS = $(SUBDIRS:%=clean-%)
>>> +
>>> +clean: $(CLEANDIRS)
>>> +$(CLEANDIRS):
>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(@:clean-%=%) clean >/dev/null
>>> +
>>> +.PHONY: all clean $(SUBDIRS) $(CLEANDIRS) $(INSTALLDIRS)
>>> +
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/Makefile.miniconfig b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/Makefile.miniconfig
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..cedd26c6a0eb
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/Makefile.miniconfig
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>> +# Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@....com>, 2021
>>> +
>>> +ifndef DESTDIR
>>> +prefix ?= $(HOME)
>>> +endif
>>> +
>>> +DESTDIR_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(DESTDIR))
>>> +perfexecdir = libexec/perf-core
>>> +perfexec_instdir = $(perfexecdir)
>>> +
>>> +ifneq ($(filter /%,$(firstword $(perfexecdir))),)
>>> +perfexec_instdir = $(perfexecdir)
>>> +else
>>> +perfexec_instdir = $(prefix)/$(perfexecdir)
>>> +endif
>>> +
>>> +perfexec_instdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(perfexec_instdir))
>>> +INSTALL = install
>>> +
>>> +include ../../../../../../scripts/Makefile.include
>>> +include ../../../../../../scripts/Makefile.arch
>>> +include ../../../../../../scripts/utilities.mak
>>
>> As suggested above, if we refer the building method of jevent, I think
>> this Makefile.miniconfig is not needed anymore.
>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/asm_pure_loop/Makefile b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/asm_pure_loop/Makefile
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..10c5a60cb71c
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/asm_pure_loop/Makefile
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +# Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@....com>, 2021
>>> +
>>> +include ../Makefile.miniconfig
>>> +
>>> +BIN=asm_pure_loop
>>> +LIB=
>>> +
>>> +all: $(BIN)
>>> +
>>> +$(BIN): $(BIN).S
>>> +ifdef CORESIGHT
>>> +ifeq ($(ARCH),arm64)
>>> + $(Q)$(CC) $(BIN).S -nostdlib -static -o $(BIN) $(LIB)
>>> +endif
>>> +endif
>>> +
>>> +install-tests: all
>>> +ifdef CORESIGHT
>>> +ifeq ($(ARCH),arm64)
>>> + $(call QUIET_INSTALL, tests) \
>>> + $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell/tools/$(BIN)'; \
>>> + $(INSTALL) $(BIN) '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell/tools/$(BIN)/$(BIN)'
>>> +endif
>>> +endif
>>> +
>>> +clean:
>>> + $(Q)$(RM) -f $(BIN)
>>> +
>>> +.PHONY: all clean install-tests
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/asm_pure_loop/asm_pure_loop.S b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/asm_pure_loop/asm_pure_loop.S
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..262876451021
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/tools/coresight/asm_pure_loop/asm_pure_loop.S
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/* Tamas Zsoldos <tamas.zsoldos@....com>, 2021 */
>>> +
>>> +.globl _start
>>> +_start:
>>> + mov x0, 0x000fffff
>>> + mov x1, xzr
>>> +loop:
>>> + nop
>>> + nop
>>> + cbnz x1, noskip
>>> + nop
>>> + nop
>>> + adrp x2, skip
>>> + add x2, x2, :lo12:skip
>>> + br x2
>>> + nop
>>> + nop
>>> +noskip:
>>> + nop
>>> + nop
>>> +skip:
>>> + sub x0, x0, 1
>>> + cbnz x0, loop
>>> +
>>> + mov x0, #0
>>> + mov x8, #93 // __NR_exit syscall
>>> + svc #0
>>
>> I verified this code on Arm64 machine and it works!
>>
>> I am a bit worry about the code for using the hard code number for
>> system call. Another option is to use the inline assembly
>> in C code, I think you have considered for this approach, this might
>> introduce noise for extra branch instructions during the testing,
>> but it can allow us to program standard C program (and don't worry
>> about the program exiting).
>>
>> If you think using assembly code is better than inline assembly, it
>> would be fine for me. Eventually, the system call number is very
>> seldomly to be changed.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists