[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fb651e9-3e36-0b36-81d0-8cdd865eecdf@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 09:23:25 -0600
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, Mikolaj Lisik <lisik@...gle.com>,
Venu Busireddy <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/40] x86/sev: Check the vmpl level
On 12/20/21 12:10 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 04:33:02PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>>>>> + * There is no straightforward way to query the current VMPL level. The
>>>>>> + * simplest method is to use the RMPADJUST instruction to change a page
>>>>>> + * permission to a VMPL level-1, and if the guest kernel is launched at
>>>>>> + * a level <= 1, then RMPADJUST instruction will return an error.
>>>>> Perhaps a nit. When you say "level <= 1", do you mean a level lower than or
>>>>> equal to 1 semantically, or numerically?
>>>
>>> Its numerically, please see the AMD APM vol 3.
>>
>> Actually it is not numerically... if it was numerically, then 0 <= 1 would
>> return an error, but VMPL0 is the highest permission level.
>
> Just write in that comment exactly what this function does:
>
> "RMPADJUST modifies RMP permissions of a lesser-privileged (numerically
> higher) privilege level. Here, clear the VMPL1 permission mask of the
> GHCB page. If the guest is not running at VMPL0, this will fail.
>
> If the guest is running at VMP0, it will succeed. Even if that operation
> modifies permission bits, it is still ok to do currently because Linux
> SNP guests are supported only on VMPL0 so VMPL1 or higher permission
> masks changing is a don't-care."
>
> and then everything is clear wrt numbering, privilege, etc.
>
> Ok?
>
Noted.
thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists