[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdRtFob8gcxqEIZE@debian>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:51:50 +0000
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/27] 4.19.224-rc1 review
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 03:23:40PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.224 release.
> There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Jan 2022 14:20:40 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 63 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 116 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/581
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists