lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Jan 2022 11:22:50 -0500
From:   "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     freude@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 01/15] s390/vfio-ap: Set pqap hook when vfio_ap module
 is loaded

On 10/21/21 11:23, Tony Krowiak wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index a604d51acfc8..05569d077d7f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -799,16 +799,17 @@ struct kvm_s390_cpu_model {
>   	unsigned short ibc;
>   };
>   
> -typedef int (*crypto_hook)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +struct kvm_s390_crypto_hook {
> +	int (*fcn)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +};

Why are we storing a single function pointer inside a struct? Seems simpler to just use a 
function pointer. What was the problem with the typedef that you are replacing?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ