[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47dc7326-b802-6023-6144-7bf4309756b4@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 11:22:50 -0500
From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: freude@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 01/15] s390/vfio-ap: Set pqap hook when vfio_ap module
is loaded
On 10/21/21 11:23, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index a604d51acfc8..05569d077d7f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -799,16 +799,17 @@ struct kvm_s390_cpu_model {
> unsigned short ibc;
> };
>
> -typedef int (*crypto_hook)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +struct kvm_s390_crypto_hook {
> + int (*fcn)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +};
Why are we storing a single function pointer inside a struct? Seems simpler to just use a
function pointer. What was the problem with the typedef that you are replacing?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists