linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] media: davinci: vpif: fix unbalanced runtime PM get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8vS6O8YDVutH_df+v3B093aSVqpeXv4FAoChxjOjEQkkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jan 2022 18:05:28 +0000
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Lad@...lan
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] media: davinci: vpif: fix unbalanced runtime PM get

Hi Johan,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:20 PM Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Make sure to balance the runtime PM usage counter on driver unbind.
>
> Fixes: 407ccc65bfd2 ("[media] davinci: vpif: add pm_runtime support")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org      # 3.9
> Cc: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c
> index 5a89d885d0e3..9752a5ec36f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c
> @@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ static int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>  static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +       pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.32.0
>

Cheers,
Prabhakar