[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKZcr38aXwN6DyV7C9Ernfwkz5nsx8pXapKGNmnZ1JMDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:53:19 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/13] kprobe/bpf: Add support to attach multiple kprobes
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 12:09 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> hi,
> adding support to attach multiple kprobes within single syscall
> and speed up attachment of many kprobes.
>
> The previous attempt [1] wasn't fast enough, so coming with new
> approach that adds new kprobe interface.
>
> The attachment speed of of this approach (tested in bpftrace)
> is now comparable to ftrace tracer attachment speed.. fast ;-)
What are the absolute numbers?
How quickly a single bpf prog can attach to 1k kprobes?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists