[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4c17b11-16f4-ef70-5897-02f923907963@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 12:55:04 -0600
From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs@...il.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Douglas R. Reno" <renodr2002@...il.com>,
Pierre Labastie <pierre.labastie@...f.fr>
Subject: mdadm regression tests fail
I am trying to document the mdadm-4.2 installation procedures for our book,
https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/mdadm.html
For testing, I am doing a simple:
make
sudo ./test --keep-going --logdir=test-logs --save-logs
But I get failures for about half the tests.
Digging in a bit I just ran:
sudo ./test --tests=00raid0 --logdir=test-logs
This is the first test that fails. With some hacking, it appears that the first
portion of this test that fails is:
mdadm -CR $md0 -e0.90 -l0 -n4 $dev0 $dev1 $dev2 $dev3
This resolves to
mdadm -CR /dev/md0 -e0.90 -l0 -n4 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3
There is not a lot of error output in the test, so I manually ran:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/mdtest0 count=20000 bs=1K
losetup /dev/loop0 /tmp/mdtest0
For /dev/loop[0123]
Then I ran
mdadm -CR /dev/md0 -e0.90 -l0 -n4 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3
mdadm: 0.90 metadata does not support layouts for RAID0
My question is whether the regression tests in the tarball are valid for mdadm-4.2?
-- Bruce Dubbs
linuxfromscratch.org
Note: The kernel is version 5.15.12.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists