[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4101B942-6327-49A9-BE8B-9E51F0427F50@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:55:17 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Gairuboyina, Charishma1" <charishma1.gairuboyina@...el.com>,
"Dwarakanath, Kumar N" <kumar.n.dwarakanath@...el.com>,
"Krishnakumar, Lalithambika" <lalithambika.krishnakumar@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] x86: Support Key Locker
On Dec 15, 2021, at 17:09, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:51:59PM -0800, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> == Disk Encryption Use Case ==
<snip>
>> $ cryptsetup luksFormat --cipher="capi:xts-aes-aeskl-plain" <device>
>
> plain64 is supposed to be used these days, not plain.
I see.
>> == Non Use Cases ==
>>
>> Bare metal disk encryption is the only use case intended by these patches.
>
> Since dm-crypt is the use case for these patches, you probably should CC this
> patchset to dm-devel@...hat.com so that the dm-crypt developers are aware of it.
Oh, I should have included them. I was not aware of this mailing address.
Hi DM-crypt folks,
Here is the patch series:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211214005212.20588-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com/t/
I would appreciate if you give any feedback on this feature’s use case with yours.
>> +-----------+---------------+---------------+
>> | Cipher | Encryption | Decryption |
>> | (AES-KL) | (MiB/s) | (MiB/s) |
>> +-----------+---------------+---------------+
>> | AES-CBC | 505.3 | 2097.8 |
>> | AES-XTS | 1130 | 696.4 |
>> +-----------+-------------------------------+
>
> Why is AES-XTS decryption so much slower than AES-XTS encryption? They should
> be about the same.
Analyzing and understanding this with specific hardware implementation takes
time for us. Will come back and update you when we have anything to share here.
> Also, is the AES-CBC support really useful, given that for disk encryption,
> AES-XTS is recommended over AES-CBC these days?
Yes, we understand that AES-XTS is the primary option for disk encryption.
But it seems that AES-CBC had been used for disk encryption, [1]:
Comparing XTS to CBC for hard disk encryption
If a storage device vendor is seeking FIPS 140-2 certification today,
they will typically use CBC encryption, or even ECB. CBC is a good
mode, ...
As long as it is factual that the mode was once popular, it can help somebody
who wants to use Key Locker for an old disk image I think.
Thanks,
Chang
[1] https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/Block-Cipher-Techniques/documents/BCM/Comments/XTS/XTS_comments-Ball.pdf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists