[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276A5116B76143CB694D1738C4B9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:03:33 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Zhong, Yang" <yang.zhong@...el.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
"jing2.liu@...ux.intel.com" <jing2.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"Zeng, Guang" <guang.zeng@...el.com>,
"Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 18/21] kvm: x86: Add support for getting/setting
expanded xstate buffer
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 4:46 AM
>
> On 1/4/22 20:46, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021, Yang Zhong wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> index bdf89c28d2ce..76e1941db223 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> @@ -4296,6 +4296,11 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm
> *kvm, long ext)
> >> else
> >> r = 0;
> >> break;
> >> + case KVM_CAP_XSAVE2:
> >> + r = kvm->vcpus[0]->arch.guest_fpu.uabi_size;
> >
> > a) This does not compile against kvm/queue.
> >
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function ‘kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension’:
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:4317:24: error: ‘struct kvm’ has no member named
> ‘vcpus’
> > 4317 | r = kvm->vcpus[0]->arch.guest_fpu.uabi_size;
> >
> > b) vcpu0 is not guaranteed to be non-NULL at this point.
>
> Yang, you can post an incremental patch for this. You can use the
> highest bit of the guest-permitted xcr0 (i.e. the OR of KVM's supported
> XCR0 an the guest-permitted dynamic features) and pass it to cpuid(0xD).
>
Will do, except one correction that 'OR' should be 'AND' here. 😊
Thanks
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists