[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e811968-4467-daf7-eb59-1e1827371ebd@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 16:24:02 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] userfaultfd/selftests: clean up hugetlb allocation code
On 1/4/22 14:35, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:17 PM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Looks functionally correct to me besides the one style gripe,
>
> Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Thanks Axel!
The userfaultfd test is not so easy to follow. While looking at this, I
noticed that we skip the mremap() testing for hugetlb. However, Mina recently
added hugetlb mremap support. Unfortunately, mremap hugetlb testing fails
if enabled. I am still trying to determine the root cause, but would like
to eliminate this special case if possible.
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists