[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220105085452.GA5406@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 09:54:52 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: maz@...nel.org, ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com, chi.minghao@....com.cn,
ryazanov.s.a@...il.com, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips/pci: remove redundant ret variable
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 11:20:24AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> Return value from rt3883_pci_r32() directly instead
> of taking this in another redundant variable.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c
> index d3c947fa2969..e07ae098bdd8 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c
> @@ -102,14 +102,12 @@ static u32 rt3883_pci_read_cfg32(struct rt3883_pci_controller *rpc,
> unsigned func, unsigned reg)
> {
> u32 address;
> - u32 ret;
>
> address = rt3883_pci_get_cfgaddr(bus, slot, func, reg);
>
> rt3883_pci_w32(rpc, address, RT3883_PCI_REG_CFGADDR);
> - ret = rt3883_pci_r32(rpc, RT3883_PCI_REG_CFGDATA);
>
> - return ret;
> + return rt3883_pci_r32(rpc, RT3883_PCI_REG_CFGDATA);
> }
>
> static void rt3883_pci_write_cfg32(struct rt3883_pci_controller *rpc,
> --
> 2.25.1
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists