[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PSAPR06MB40212930193B005F6366D0CFDF4B9@PSAPR06MB4021.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 01:17:42 +0000
From: 赵军奎 <bernard@...o.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] gpu/drm: fix potential memleak in error branch
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: bernard@...o.com <bernard@...o.com> 代表 Jani Nikula
发送时间: 2022年1月4日 19:25
收件人: 赵军奎 <bernard@...o.com>; Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>; Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>; Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>; David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>; dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH] gpu/drm: fix potential memleak in error branch
On Tue, 04 Jan 2022, 赵军奎 <bernard@...o.com> wrote:
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: bernard@...o.com <bernard@...o.com> 代表 Jani Nikula
> 发送时间: 2021年12月31日 19:09
> 收件人: 赵军奎 <bernard@...o.com>; Maarten Lankhorst
> <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>; Maxime Ripard
> <mripard@...nel.org>; Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>; David
> Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>;
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> 抄送: 赵军奎 <bernard@...o.com>
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm: fix potential memleak in error branch
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com> wrote:
>> This patch try to fix potential memleak in error branch.
>
>>Please elaborate.
>
> Hi Jani:
>
> This patch try to fix potential memleak in error branch.
> For example:
> nv50_sor_create ->nv50_mstm_new-> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init In
> function drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init, there are five error branches, error branch just return error code, no free called.
> And we see that the caller didn`t do the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_destroy job.
> I am not sure if there some gap, I think this may bring in the risk of memleak issue.
> Thanks!
>This should be part of the commit message.
Hi Jani:
Thanks for your comments, I will resubmit this patch!
BR//Bernard
>
> BR//Bernard
>
>>BR,
>>Jani.
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> index f3d79eda94bb..f73b180dee73 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> @@ -5501,7 +5501,10 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>> int max_lane_count, int max_link_rate,
>> int conn_base_id)
>> {
>> - struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state;
>> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state = NULL;
This is superfluous.
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
>> +
>> + mgr->payloads = NULL;
>> + mgr->proposed_vcpis = NULL;
>>
>> mutex_init(&mgr->lock);
>> mutex_init(&mgr->qlock);
>> @@ -5523,7 +5526,7 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>> */
>> mgr->delayed_destroy_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("drm_dp_mst_wq", 0);
>> if (mgr->delayed_destroy_wq == NULL)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out;
>>
>> INIT_WORK(&mgr->work, drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work);
>> INIT_WORK(&mgr->tx_work, drm_dp_tx_work); @@ -5539,18 +5542,18 @@
>> int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>> mgr->conn_base_id = conn_base_id;
>> if (max_payloads + 1 > sizeof(mgr->payload_mask) * 8 ||
>> max_payloads + 1 > sizeof(mgr->vcpi_mask) * 8)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + goto failed;
>> mgr->payloads = kcalloc(max_payloads, sizeof(struct drm_dp_payload), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!mgr->payloads)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + goto failed;
>> mgr->proposed_vcpis = kcalloc(max_payloads, sizeof(struct drm_dp_vcpi *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!mgr->proposed_vcpis)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + goto failed;
>> set_bit(0, &mgr->payload_mask);
>>
>> mst_state = kzalloc(sizeof(*mst_state), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (mst_state == NULL)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + goto failed;
>>
>> mst_state->total_avail_slots = 63;
>> mst_state->start_slot = 1;
>> @@ -5563,6 +5566,13 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>> &drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs);
>>
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +failed:
>> + kfree(mgr->proposed_vcpis);
>> + kfree(mgr->payloads);
>> + destroy_workqueue(mgr->delayed_destroy_wq);
>> +out:
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init);
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists