[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68961242-3d9b-a26d-3a0f-0d2ace04a17b@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:46:34 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] coresight: trbe: Work around the invalid prohibited
states
On 1/5/22 3:43 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Anshuman
>
> On 05/01/2022 05:05, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> TRBE implementations affected by Arm erratum #2038923 might get TRBE into
>> an inconsistent view on whether trace is prohibited within the CPU. As a
>> result, the trace buffer or trace buffer state might be corrupted. This
>> happens after TRBE buffer has been enabled by setting TRBLIMITR_EL1.E,
>> followed by just a single context synchronization event before execution
>> changes from a context, in which trace is prohibited to one where it isn't,
>> or vice versa. In these mentioned conditions, the view of whether trace is
>> prohibited is inconsistent between parts of the CPU, and the trace buffer
>> or the trace buffer state might be corrupted.
>>
>> Work around this problem in the TRBE driver by preventing an inconsistent
>> view of whether the trace is prohibited or not based on TRBLIMITR_EL1.E by
>> immediately following a change to TRBLIMITR_EL1.E with at least one ISB
>> instruction before an ERET, or two ISB instructions if no ERET is to take
>> place. This adds a new cpu errata in arm64 errata framework and also
>> updates TRBE driver as required.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org
>> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 2 +
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 23 ++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 9 ++++
>> arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 1 +
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c | 47 +++++++++++++++-----
>> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> As with the previous patch, it may be a good idea to split the
> patch to arm64 and trbe parts.
Sure, will do.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
>> index c9b30e6c2b6c..e0ef3e9a4b8b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
>> @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ stable kernels.
>> +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
>> | ARM | Cortex-A510 | #2064142 | ARM64_ERRATUM_2064142 |
>> +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
>> +| ARM | Cortex-A510 | #2038923 | ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923 |
>> ++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
>> | ARM | Cortex-A53 | #826319 | ARM64_ERRATUM_826319 |
>> +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
>> | ARM | Cortex-A53 | #827319 | ARM64_ERRATUM_827319 |
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index 2105b68d88db..026e34fb6fad 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -796,6 +796,29 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_2064142
>> If unsure, say Y.
>> +config ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923
>> + bool "Cortex-A510: 2038923: workaround TRBE corruption with enable"
>> + depends on CORESIGHT_TRBE
>> + default y
>> + help
>> + This option adds the workaround for ARM Cortex-A510 erratum 2038923.
>> +
>> + Affected Cortex-A510 core might cause an inconsistent view on whether trace is
>> + prohibited within the CPU. As a result, the trace buffer or trace buffer state
>> + might be corrupted. This happens after TRBE buffer has been enabled by setting
>> + TRBLIMITR_EL1.E, followed by just a single context synchronization event before
>> + execution changes from a context, in which trace is prohibited to one where it
>> + isn't, or vice versa. In these mentioned conditions, the view of whether trace
>> + is prohibited is inconsistent between parts of the CPU, and the trace buffer or
>> + the trace buffer state might be corrupted.
>> +
>> + Work around this in the driver by preventing an inconsistent view of whether the
>> + trace is prohibited or not based on TRBLIMITR_EL1.E by immediately following a
>> + change to TRBLIMITR_EL1.E with at least one ISB instruction before an ERET, or
>> + two ISB instructions if no ERET is to take place.
>> +
>> + If unsure, say Y.
>> +
>> config CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22375
>> bool "Cavium erratum 22375, 24313"
>> default y
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
>> index cbb7d5a9aee7..60b0c1f1d912 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
>> @@ -607,6 +607,15 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = {
>> ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 2)
>> },
>> #endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923
>> + {
>> + .desc = "ARM erratum 2038923",
>> + .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2038923,
>> +
>> + /* Cortex-A510 r0p0 - r0p2 */
>> + ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 2)
>> + },
>> +#endif
>> {
>> }
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
>> index fca3cb329e1d..45a06d36d080 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ WORKAROUND_1463225
>> WORKAROUND_1508412
>> WORKAROUND_1542419
>> WORKAROUND_2064142
>> +WORKAROUND_2038923
>> WORKAROUND_TRBE_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE
>> WORKAROUND_TSB_FLUSH_FAILURE
>> WORKAROUND_TRBE_WRITE_OUT_OF_RANGE
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>> index ec24b62b2cec..0689c6dab96d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>> @@ -92,11 +92,13 @@ struct trbe_buf {
>> #define TRBE_WORKAROUND_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE 0
>> #define TRBE_WORKAROUND_WRITE_OUT_OF_RANGE 1
>> #define TRBE_WORKAROUND_SYSREG_WRITE_FAILURE 2
>> +#define TRBE_WORKAROUND_CORRUPTION_WITH_ENABLE 3
>> static int trbe_errata_cpucaps[] = {
>> [TRBE_WORKAROUND_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE] = ARM64_WORKAROUND_TRBE_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE,
>> [TRBE_WORKAROUND_WRITE_OUT_OF_RANGE] = ARM64_WORKAROUND_TRBE_WRITE_OUT_OF_RANGE,
>> [TRBE_WORKAROUND_SYSREG_WRITE_FAILURE] = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2064142,
>> + [TRBE_WORKAROUND_CORRUPTION_WITH_ENABLE] = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2038923,
>> -1, /* Sentinel, must be the last entry */
>> };
>> @@ -174,6 +176,11 @@ static inline bool trbe_may_fail_sysreg_write(struct trbe_cpudata *cpudata)
>> return trbe_has_erratum(cpudata, TRBE_WORKAROUND_SYSREG_WRITE_FAILURE);
>> }
>> +static inline bool trbe_may_corrupt_with_enable(struct trbe_cpudata *cpudata)
>> +{
>
> minor nit: trbe_needs_{ctxt_sync, isb}_after_enable() ?
trbe_needs_ctxt_sync_after_enable() sounds better. Also will have to change
the index above as well .. TRBE_NEEDS_CTXT_SYNC_AFTER_ENABLE.
>
>> + return trbe_has_erratum(cpudata, TRBE_WORKAROUND_CORRUPTION_WITH_ENABLE);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int trbe_alloc_node(struct perf_event *event)
>> {
>> if (event->cpu == -1)
>> @@ -187,6 +194,30 @@ static inline void trbe_drain_buffer(void)
>> dsb(nsh);
>> }
>> +static inline void set_trbe_enabled(struct trbe_cpudata *cpudata)
>> +{
>> + u64 trblimitr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_TRBLIMITR_EL1);
>
> minor nit: This implies we do the TRBE programming in the following
> manner in the common case (i.e, TRBE enabled in the beginning of a
> session).
> -> set TRBE LIMIT
> -> read TRBE LIMIT
> -> set TRBE ENABLED
>
> Could we please optimize this ? I believe the buf->trbe_limit
> must hold the LIMITR value at any point in time. And thus this
But is not bit risky though ! We have got the following places where
given trbe_limit instance changes its value.
drivers/../coresight-trbe.c: buf->trbe_limit = buf->trbe_base + nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
drivers/../coresight-trbe.c: buf->trbe_limit = compute_trbe_buffer_limit(handle);
drivers/../coresight-trbe.c: buf->trbe_limit -= PAGE_SIZE;
> function could simply be :
>
> set_trbe_enabled(trbe_buf)
> {
> limitr = trbe_buf->limit | LIMITR_ENABLE
> write(limitr, TRBLIMITR_EL1);
> ...
> }
Is the potential for performance improvement here, out weigh possible
risks of using buf->trbe_limit directly while enabling the TRBE ?
>
> Otherwise looks good to me
>
> Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists