[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86bf852e-4220-52d4-259d-3455bc24def1@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 20:51:42 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: benve@...co.com, govind@....com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enic: Use dma_set_mask_and_coherent()
Le 03/01/2022 à 09:47, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 03:02:45PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> - err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(47));
>> + err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(47));
>> if (err) {
>> + err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> if (err) {
>> dev_err(dev, "No usable DMA configuration, aborting\n");
>> goto err_out_release_regions;
>> }
>> } else {
>> using_dac = 1;
>
> There is no need for the callback. All the routines to set a DMA mask
> will only fail if the passed in mask is too small, but never if it is
> larger than what is supported. Also the using_dac variable is not
> needed, NETIF_F_HIGHDMA can and should be set unconditionally.
>
Ok, thanks.
I was only aware of the 64 bits case.
The patch has already reached -next.
I'll send another patch on to of it to go one step further.
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists