linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/24] pinctrl: samsung: drop pin banks references on error paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e54c289c-6aeb-fcf4-67fe-fc8e375149f9@canonical.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:24:29 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc:     Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@...nel.org>,
        Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] pinctrl: samsung: drop pin banks references on
 error paths

On 03/01/2022 15:49, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 18:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
>>
>> The driver iterates over its devicetree children with
>> for_each_child_of_node() and stores for later found node pointer.  This
>> has to be put in error paths to avoid leak during re-probing.
>>
>> Fixes: ab663789d697 ("pinctrl: samsung: Match pin banks with their device nodes")
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> index 8941f658e7f1..f2864a7869b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> @@ -1002,6 +1002,15 @@ samsung_pinctrl_get_soc_data_for_of_alias(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         return &(of_data->ctrl[id]);
>>  }
>>
>> +static void samsung_banks_of_node_put(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d)
>> +{
>> +       struct samsung_pin_bank *bank;
>> +       unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +       for (i = 0; i < d->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank)
>> +               of_node_put(bank->of_node);
> 
> But "bank" variable wasn't actually assigned before, only declared?

Good point, bank has to be assigned just like in patch 2/24.

> 
>> +}
>> +

Best regards,
Krzysztof