[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97c7381e-c618-a074-b1bf-5c59644f35f0@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:09:46 +0800
From: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>, dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net/smc: Reset conn->lgr when link group
registration fails
Thanks for your suggestion.
On 2022/1/5 9:25 pm, Karsten Graul wrote:
> It might look cleaner with the following changes:
> - adopt smc_lgr_cleanup_early() to take only an lgr as parameter and remove the call to smc_conn_free()
> - change smc_conn_abort() (which is the only caller of smc_lgr_cleanup_early() right now), always
> call smc_conn_free() and if (local_first) additionally call smc_lgr_cleanup_early()
> (hold a local copy of the lgr for this call)
> - finally call smc_lgr_cleanup_early(lgr) from smc_conn_create()
>
> This should be the same processing, but the smc_conn_free() is moved to smc_conn_abort() where
> it looks to be a better place for this call. And smc_lgr_cleanup_early() takes only care of an lgr.
>
I think those are very good changes, making smc_lgr_cleanup_early() processing link group only and
more reusable.
> What do you think? Did I miss something?
I think it is better and complete. I will improve the patch and test it, then send a v4.
Thanks,
Wen Gu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists