linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 07/21] x86/fpu: Provide fpu_enable_guest_xfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220106060255.GA2395@yangzhon-Virtual>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jan 2022 14:02:55 +0800
From:   Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net, shuah@...nel.org,
        seanjc@...gle.com, jun.nakajima@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        jing2.liu@...ux.intel.com, jing2.liu@...el.com,
        guang.zeng@...el.com, wei.w.wang@...el.com, yang.zhong@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/21] x86/fpu: Provide
 fpu_enable_guest_xfd_features() for KVM

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 02:06:40PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 1/5/22 13:35, Yang Zhong wrote:
> >+int fpu_enable_guest_xfd_features(struct fpu_guest *guest_fpu, u64 xfeatures)
> >+{
> >+	lockdep_assert_preemption_enabled();
> >+
> 
> The old fpu_update_guest_perm_features(guest_fpu) is equivalent to
> 
> 	fpu_enable_guest_xfd_features(guest_fpu, guest_fpu->perm);
> 
> Missing doc comment:
> 
> /*
>  * fpu_enable_guest_xfd_features - Enable xfeatures according to guest perm
>  * @guest_fpu:         Pointer to the guest FPU container
>  * @xfeatures:         Features requested by guest CPUID
>  *
>  * Enable all dynamic xfeatures according to guest perm and requested CPUID.
>  * Invoked if the caller wants to conservatively expand fpstate buffer instead
>  * of waiting until XCR0 or XFD MSR is written.
>  *
>  * Return: 0 on success, error code otherwise
>  */
> 
> Also, the check for 32-bit is slightly imprecise:
> 
> 	/* Dynamic xfeatures are not supported with 32-bit kernels. */
> 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64))
> -		return 0;
> +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> since we only get here with xfeatures != 0 (if it compiles, just removing
> the IS_ENABLED check altogether would be even better).  With these changes,
> 

  Paolo, I did 32 bit kernel build tests

  (1). w/ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64)

      if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64))
      	return -EINVAL; 
    
     This 32 bit kernel can successfully build.

  (2). remove IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64)

      The 32 bit kernel build is failed, and the error as:

      ld: arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.o: in function `fpu_enable_guest_xfd_features':
/root/amx/v5/kvm/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:278: undefined reference to `__xfd_enable_feature'

      Seems we need define 32 bit API for __xfd_enable_feature().

   I also tried (1) in desktop, but I could not reboot the machine after installed 32 bit kernel.

   thanks a lot!

   Yang 





> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paolo