[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33d0f4d4-17e7-8212-c37d-d39454f3f4d3@fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 06:20:57 +0000
From: "lizhijian@...itsu.com" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"lizhijian@...itsu.com" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
CC: "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"zyjzyj2000@...il.com" <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
"aharonl@...dia.com" <aharonl@...dia.com>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mbloch@...dia.com" <mbloch@...dia.com>,
"liangwenpeng@...wei.com" <liangwenpeng@...wei.com>,
"yangx.jy@...itsu.com" <yangx.jy@...itsu.com>,
"rpearsonhpe@...il.com" <rpearsonhpe@...il.com>,
"y-goto@...itsu.com" <y-goto@...itsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH rdma-next 03/10] RDMA/rxe: Allow registering FLUSH
flags for supported device only
On 06/01/2022 08:22, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 04:07:10PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> Device should enable IB_DEVICE_RDMA_FLUSH capability if it want to
>> support RDMA FLUSH.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> index f04d66539879..51d58b641201 100644
>> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> @@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ enum ib_device_cap_flags {
>> /* The device supports padding incoming writes to cacheline. */
>> IB_DEVICE_PCI_WRITE_END_PADDING = (1ULL << 36),
>> IB_DEVICE_ALLOW_USER_UNREG = (1ULL << 37),
>> + IB_DEVICE_RDMA_FLUSH = (1ULL << 38),
>> };
>>
>> enum ib_atomic_cap {
>> @@ -4319,6 +4320,10 @@ static inline int ib_check_mr_access(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
>> if (flags & IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND &&
>> !(ib_dev->attrs.device_cap_flags & IB_DEVICE_ON_DEMAND_PAGING))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (flags & IB_ACCESS_FLUSH &&
>> + !(ib_dev->attrs.device_cap_flags & IB_DEVICE_RDMA_FLUSH))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> return 0;
>> }
> This needs to be combined with the previous patch
Make sense
Thanks
Zhijian
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists