[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220106084110.2691207-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:41:10 +0800
From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To: tiwai@...e.de
Cc: perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, leon@...nel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, joe@...ches.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: intel_hdmi: Check for error num after setting mask
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:18:01PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Well, 32bit DMA mask practically never fails on x86 (and other
> architectures, IIRC). It's fine to add a sanity check, but it's
> better to be mentioned that it never fails.
Actually, I have already found many place check the 32bit DMA mask.
For example:
snd_ad1889_create() in `sound/pci/ad1889.c`,
snd_vortex_create() in `sound/pci/au88x0/au88x0.c`
tegra_pcm_dma_allocate() in `sound/soc/tegra/tegra_pcm.c`.
Therefore, I think there must be some reason that 32bit may fail.
So, to make the system more robust, it should be better to add the
sanity check.
Sincerely thanks,
Jiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists