lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220106084110.2691207-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Date:   Thu,  6 Jan 2022 16:41:10 +0800
From:   Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To:     tiwai@...e.de
Cc:     perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, leon@...nel.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, joe@...ches.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: intel_hdmi: Check for error num after setting mask

On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:18:01PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Well, 32bit DMA mask practically never fails on x86 (and other
> architectures, IIRC).  It's fine to add a sanity check, but it's
> better to be mentioned that it never fails.

Actually, I have already found many place check the 32bit DMA mask.
For example:
snd_ad1889_create() in `sound/pci/ad1889.c`, 
snd_vortex_create() in `sound/pci/au88x0/au88x0.c`
tegra_pcm_dma_allocate() in `sound/soc/tegra/tegra_pcm.c`.
Therefore, I think there must be some reason that 32bit may fail.
So, to make the system more robust, it should be better to add the
sanity check.

Sincerely thanks,
Jiang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ