[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220106122607.GL7674@kadam>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 15:26:07 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
phil@...lpotter.co.uk, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/32] staging: r8188eu: make
odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask() static
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 09:50:56PM +0100, Michael Straube wrote:
> +static void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct odm_dm_struct *pDM_Odm)
> +{
> + u8 i;
> + struct adapter *pAdapter = pDM_Odm->Adapter;
> +
> + if (pAdapter->bDriverStopped)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ODM_ASSOCIATE_ENTRY_NUM; i++) {
> + struct sta_info *pstat = pDM_Odm->pODM_StaInfo[i];
> +
Michael, people don't thank you enough for all the clean up work on this
driver. This is not a "please resend" level issue, and also Greg
already applied the patch so resending is impossible.
But, you added a blank line here after the declaration to make checkpatch
happy. When you're moving functions around could you just leave them
exactly as-is? I have a script to help me review moving code and it
helps me if the functions stay exactly the same.
Anyway, thanks again for your cleanup work on this driver.
> + if (IS_STA_VALID(pstat)) {
> + if (ODM_RAStateCheck(pDM_Odm, pstat->rssi_stat.UndecoratedSmoothedPWDB, false, &pstat->rssi_level))
> + rtw_hal_update_ra_mask(pAdapter, i, pstat->rssi_level);
> + }
> + }
> +}
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists