[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c19c2b0b-d502-b393-db8a-cb5c57c00feb@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 15:32:52 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: <Ajish.Koshy@...rochip.com>, <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>, <Viswas.G@...rochip.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<vishakhavc@...gle.com>, <ipylypiv@...gle.com>,
<Ruksar.devadi@...rochip.com>,
<Vasanthalakshmi.Tharmarajan@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] scsi: pm8001: Fix FW crash for maxcpus=1
On 06/01/2022 13:03, Ajish.Koshy@...rochip.com wrote:
>> only a specific vector and, also, why we check at all in
>> an interrupt handler.
> Here is my initial understanding so far based on the code
> and data sheet
>
> 1. Controller has the capability to communicate
> to the host about fatal error condition via configured
> interrupt vector MSI/MSI-X.
> 2. This capability is achieved by setting two fields
> a. Enable Controller Fatal error notification
> Dowrd 0x1C, Bit[0].
> 1 - Enable; 0 - Disable
> Code: pm8001_ha->main_cfg_tbl.pm80xx_tbl.
> fatal_err_interrupt = 0x01;
> b. Fatal Error Interrupt Vector Dword 0x1C, bit[15:8]
> This parameter configures which interrupt vector
> is used to notify the host of the fatal error.
> Code: /* Update Fatal error interrupt vector */
> pm8001_ha->main_cfg_tbl.pm80xx_tbl.
> fatal_err_interrupt |=
> ((pm8001_ha->max_q_num - 1) << 8);
>
> Probably this will be the reason why we check
> the vector in process_oq() for processing
> controller fatal error
>
> if (vec == (pm8001_ha->max_q_num - 1)) {
>
> Please do let me know if it helped in clarification.
>
Sounds reasonable. And we only discover the issue for 8008/8009 now as
we have that (pm8001_ha->max_q_num - 1) vector being used for standard IO.
So let me know of any other issue, otherwise I'll send a v2 with the
coding style fixup.
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists