[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <043a206f03929c2667a465314144e518070a9b2d.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:55:12 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-cachefs@...hat.com
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 28/68] fscache: Provide a function to note the
release of a page
On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 23:20 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Provide a function to be called from a network filesystem's releasepage
> method to indicate that a page has been released that might have been a
> reflection of data upon the server - and now that data must be reloaded
> from the server or the cache.
>
> This is used to end an optimisation for empty files, in particular files
> that have just been created locally, whereby we know there cannot yet be
> any data that we would need to read from the server or the cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> cc: linux-cachefs@...hat.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163819617128.215744.4725572296135656508.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163906920354.143852.7511819614661372008.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163967128061.1823006.611781655060034988.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v3
> ---
>
> include/linux/fscache.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fscache.h b/include/linux/fscache.h
> index 18e725671594..28ce258c1f87 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fscache.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fscache.h
> @@ -607,4 +607,20 @@ static inline void fscache_clear_inode_writeback(struct fscache_cookie *cookie,
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * fscache_note_page_release - Note that a netfs page got released
> + * @cookie: The cookie corresponding to the file
> + *
> + * Note that a page that has been copied to the cache has been released. This
> + * means that future reads will need to look in the cache to see if it's there.
> + */
> +static inline
> +void fscache_note_page_release(struct fscache_cookie *cookie)
> +{
> + if (cookie &&
> + test_bit(FSCACHE_COOKIE_HAVE_DATA, &cookie->flags) &&
> + test_bit(FSCACHE_COOKIE_NO_DATA_TO_READ, &cookie->flags))
> + clear_bit(FSCACHE_COOKIE_NO_DATA_TO_READ, &cookie->flags);
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_FSCACHE_H */
>
>
Is this logic correct?
FSCACHE_COOKIE_HAVE_DATA gets set in cachefiles_write_complete, but will
that ever be called on a cookie that has no data? Will we ever call
cachefiles_write at all when there is no data to be written?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists