[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcxrq+zNuAe7Lr+=BeXLUnpQpLLTik1UGe-sZRcH7uWHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 18:28:00 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] media: davinci: vpif: Use platform_get_irq_optional()
to get the interrupt
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:11 PM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 4:02 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 5:27 PM Lad, Prabhakar
> > <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 2:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 3:43 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:41 PM Lad, Prabhakar
> > > > > <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Andy Shevchenko
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > > #define DEFINE_RES_NAMED(_start, _size, _name, _flags) \
> > > > > > - { \
> > > > > > + (struct resource) { \
> > > > >
> > > > > Yep, that's it.
> > > > >
> > > > > > .start = (_start), \
> > > > > > .end = (_start) + (_size) - 1, \
> > > > > > .name = (_name), \
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But there are some instances which need to be touched, for example
> > > > > > vexpress-sysreg.c [1]. Are you OK with files to be changed?
> > > > >
> > > > > Nice! That's exactly my point and you can sell it to the community
> > > > > because there are already users of it like this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, I'm fine, but it seems it needs to be done treewide in one patch.
> > > > > Btw, how many of those already in use?
> > > >
> > > > Actually you don't need to change that. It's an array of resources and
> > > > everything should be kept as is there.
> > > >
> > > I do get below build failures, with the above literal change for
> > > vexpress-sysreg.c.
> > >
> > > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c: At top level:
> > > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c:64:37: error: initialiser element is not constant
> > > 64 | .resources = (struct resource []) {
> > > | ^
> > > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c:64:37: note: (near initialisation for
> > > ‘vexpress_sysreg_cells[0]’)
> > Hmm... Interesting, so I suppose the fix is to drop (struct resource
> > []) parts from the driver?
> >
> A bit more than that like something below:
> - .resources = (struct resource []) {
> - DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_LED, 0x4, "dat"),
> - },
> + .resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_LED, 0x4, "dat"),
This is not an equivalent change.
The warning is about const qualifier. Can it rather be const struct
resource [] ?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists