[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220106113911.6ffb7fd0@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:39:11 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
Cc: <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <bsegall@...gle.com>,
<mgorman@...e.de>, <bristot@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] sched: Use struct_size() helper in
task_numa_group()
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:21:38 +0800
Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com> wrote:
> Make use of struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded calculation.
> There is no functional change in this patch.
I'm all for this clean up, but...
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160
> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 095b0aa378df..265e37be0c92 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2437,11 +2437,8 @@ static void task_numa_group(struct task_struct *p, int cpupid, int flags,
> int i;
>
> if (unlikely(!deref_curr_numa_group(p))) {
> - unsigned int size = sizeof(struct numa_group) +
> - NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS *
> - nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned long);
> -
> - grp = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> + grp = kzalloc(struct_size(grp, faults, NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids),
> + GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
Ug, the above is so ugly. Why remove the size variable?
unsigned int size = struct_size(grp, faults,
NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids);
-- Steve
> if (!grp)
> return;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists