[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220106134323.GA165892@fuller.cnet>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:43:23 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Alex Belits <abelits@...vell.com>,
Nitesh Lal <nilal@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicolas Saenz <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.de>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] sched/isolation: Split housekeeping cpumask
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 03:49:36PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To prepare for extending cpusets to control CPU isolation features
> (nohz_full, rcu_nocbs, unbound timers, workqueues, kthreads affinity...),
> we need to split the global housekeeping_mask to one cpumask per isolation
> feature.
>
> Doing so is quite a chunk already so I'm working on that as a standalone
> patchset. Once that get merged, the next step is to finally provide a
> cpuset interface for one of these isolation features: rcu_nocb could
> be interesting to handle first as nohz_full depends on it.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> isolation/split
>
> HEAD: 2c07a16ff50d1e722babee28b926d70522e6bd3e
>
> Thanks,
> Frederic
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists