[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ydcp01dTJZKi0yuz@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:41:39 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested
guest running
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Also I recently found that we have KVM_X86_OP and KVM_X86_OP_NULL which are the
> same thing - another thing for refactoring, so I prefer to refactor this
> in one patch series.
I have a mostly-complete patch series that removes KVM_X86_OP_NULL, will get it
finished and posted after I get through my review backlog.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists