[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ydc8wUjX4hnHg7ZE@archlinux-ax161>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 12:02:25 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Samuel Zeter <samuelzeter@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** Fix reformat_objdump.awk ***
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:36:03PM +1100, Samuel Zeter wrote:
> These are two small patches which originally dealt with
> the problem found at:
>
> https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1364
>
> The original steps to reproduce were:
> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 defconfig
> $ scripts/config -e X86_DECODER_SELFTEST
> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 olddefconfig bzImage
>
> Which resulted in the error:
> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 0 bytes, but
> insn_get_length() says 2
>
> Upon inspection it turned out llvm-objdump was formatting its
> output differently, which caused objdump_reformat.awk to incorrectly
> output its values.
>
> After fixing that bug, a second one was seen where the instruction
> "wait" was incorrectly matched with "fwait", which again caused
> insn_decoder_test to fail.
Thanks a lot for sending these fixes!
I can confirm with this series and the removal of chkobjdump.awk [1] on
top of v5.16-rc8, the insn_decoder_test now passes with LLVM 11 through
14.
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
For the future, I recommend putting the maintainers in the "To" field,
rather than "Cc", to ensure they actually see it. Additionally, I see
some small nits in the commit message that the tip maintainers might
comment on, see
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#changelog
for some more info.
Masami Hiramatsu originally wrote this file and has a few fixes to it
since, adding him now for review. The original thread is available at:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220106023606.283953-1-samuelzeter@gmail.com/
[1]: https://git.kernel.org/nathan/c/2f137c324b21f1c21b8830d8896cb9957009f969
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists