linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: refine the check of available clock divider

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <164150089249.2243486.14713961651621458604.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 06 Jan 2022 20:28:12 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
        Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, festevam@...il.com,
        nicoleotsuka@...il.com, timur@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: refine the check of available clock divider

On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:08:03 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> According to RM, the clock divider range is from 1 to 8, clock
> prescaling ratio may be any power of 2 from 1 to 128.
> So the supported divider is not all the value between
> 1 and 1024, just limited value in that range.
> 
> Create table for the supported divder and add function to
> check the clock divider is available by comparing with
> the table.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_asrc: refine the check of available clock divider
      commit: 320386343451ab6a3577e0ee200dac56a6182944

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark