linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86/PCI: Odd generic PIRQ router improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:25:28 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86/PCI: Odd generic PIRQ router improvements

On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 11:24:19PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  Resending as this has gone into void.  Also there is a context dependency 
> with a change developed later possibly causing a merge conflict, so to 
> make it easier to queue the incoming patches I have folded the follow-up 
> change into this series, expanding it to 4 patches from the original 3 and 
> mechanically regenerating according to upstream changes.  I have updated 
> the cover letter accordingly.

I'm assuming the x86/IRQ folks will handle this, too.