[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220107021030.E932AC36AE3@smtp.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 18:10:29 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] clk: ralink: make system controller a reset provider
Quoting Sergio Paracuellos (2021-12-13 04:00:17)
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 8:42 AM Sergio Paracuellos
> <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series add minimal change to provide mt7621 resets properly
> > defining them in the 'mediatek,mt7621-sysc' node which is the system
> > controller of the SoC and is already providing clocks to the rest of
> > the world.
> >
> > There is shared architecture code for all ralink platforms in 'reset.c'
> > file located in 'arch/mips/ralink' but the correct thing to do to align
> > hardware with software seems to define and add related reset code to the
> > already mainlined clock driver.
> >
> > After this changes, we can get rid of the useless reset controller node
> > in the device tree and use system controller node instead where the property
> > '#reset-cells' has been added. Binding documentation for this nodeq has
> > been updated with the new property accordly.
> >
> > This series also provide a bindings include header where all related
> > reset bits for the MT7621 SoC are defined.
> >
> > Also, please take a look to this review [0] to understand better motivation
Is [0] a link?
> > for this series.
> >
> > Regarding the way of merging this:
> > - I'd like patches 1 and 4 which are related going through staging tree.
> > - The other two (patches 2 and 3) can perfectly go through the clock tree.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your feedback.
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Move platform driver init process into 'arch_initcall' to be sure the
> > rest of the world can get the resets available when needed (since PCIe
> > controller driver has been moved from staging into 'drivers/pci/controller'
> > is probed earlier and reset was not available so it was returning
> > -EPROBE_DEFER on firt try. Moving into 'arch_initcall' avoids the 'a bit
> > anoying' PCI first failed log trace.
>
> Gentle ping on this series.
>
It looks to largely be a reset controller patch series. Can you get
review from the reset maintainer?
RESET CONTROLLER FRAMEWORK
M: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
S: Maintained
Powered by blists - more mailing lists