[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yde2wwNmqzRTxh1f@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 03:42:59 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] exit: Move oops specific logic from do_exit into
make_task_dead
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:48:08AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 02:25:25PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > The beginning of do_exit has become cluttered and difficult to read as
> > it is filled with checks to handle things that can only happen when
> > the kernel is operating improperly.
> >
> > Now that we have a dedicated function for cleaning up a task when the
> > kernel is operating improperly move the checks there.
>
> Umm... I would probably take profile_task_exit() crap out before that
> point.
> 1) the damn thing is dead - nothing registers notifiers there
> 2) blocking_notifier_call_chain() is not a nice thing to do on oops...
>
> I'll post a patch ripping the dead parts of kernel/profile.c out tomorrow
> morning (there's also profile_handoff_task(), equally useless these days
> and complicating things for __put_task_struct()).
Argh... OK, so your subsequent series had pretty much the same thing.
My apologies - still digging myself out from mail pile that had accumulated
over two months ;-/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists