[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <456972f1-0237-81db-69cf-363f9ac611e0@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:23:05 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/8] iommu/amd: Use iommu_attach/detach_device()
Hi Jason,
On 1/6/22 10:33 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 10:20:50AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> The individual device driver should use iommu_attach/detach_device()
>> for domain attachment/detachment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>> drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c
>> index 58da08cc3d01..7d9d0fe89064 100644
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c
>> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static void free_device_state(struct device_state *dev_state)
>> if (WARN_ON(!group))
>> return;
>>
>> - iommu_detach_group(dev_state->domain, group);
>> + iommu_detach_device(dev_state->domain, &dev_state->pdev->dev);
>>
>> iommu_group_put(group);
>
> This is the only user of the group in the function all the
> group_get/put should be deleted too.
>
> Joerg said in commit 55c99a4dc50f ("iommu/amd: Use
> iommu_attach_group()") that the device API doesn't work here because
> there are multi-device groups?
>
> But I'm not sure how this can work with multi-device groups - this
> seems to assigns a domain setup for direct map, so perhaps this only
> works if all devices are setup for direct map?
It's also difficult for me to understand how this can work with multi-
device group. The iommu_attach_group() returns -EBUSY if _init_device()
is called for the second device in the group. That's the reason why I
didn't set no_kernel_dma.
>
>> @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ int amd_iommu_init_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasids)
>> goto out_free_domain;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = iommu_attach_group(dev_state->domain, group);
>> + ret = iommu_attach_device(dev_state->domain, &pdev->dev);
>> if (ret != 0)
>> goto out_drop_group;
>
> Same comment here
Yes.
>
> Jason
>
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists