[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdgjJRwLjIBWVQvU@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:25:25 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] staging: r8188eu: release_firmware is not called
if allocation fails
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 02:15:19PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 1/7/22 13:36, Michael Straube wrote:
> > In function load_firmware() release_firmware() is not called if the
> > allocation of pFirmware->szFwBuffer fails or if fw->size is greater
> > than FW_8188E_SIZE.
> >
> > Move the call to release_firmware() to the exit label at the end of
> > the function to fix this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c
> > index dc41682fd8d6..cfafbb6c42f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c
> > @@ -538,10 +538,10 @@ static int load_firmware(struct rt_firmware *pFirmware, struct device *device)
> > }
> > memcpy(pFirmware->szFwBuffer, fw->data, fw->size);
> > pFirmware->ulFwLength = fw->size;
> > - release_firmware(fw);
> > dev_dbg(device, "!bUsedWoWLANFw, FmrmwareLen:%d+\n", pFirmware->ulFwLength);
> > Exit:
> > + release_firmware(fw);
> > return rtStatus;
> > }
>
>
> This patch looks like a bug fix and it should go to stable kernels as well.
> The problem is this patch is made on top of 2 previous clean up patches, so
> it can't go to stable as is.
>
> I think, the less painful way is to move this patch on the first place in
> this series. On the other hand you can just resend this one separately.
>
>
> Or, maybe, Greg knows some magic that will help here, we can wait him before
> you resend 20 patch series :)
It's just not worth it for this staging driver, and for an allocation
failure, to be backported here. Allocation failures almost never happen
in real-world situations, and if they do, they are not alone, so this
would be the least of the problems happening here.
So no need to care about it, I can take this as-is.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists