linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] ext4: fast commit may miss file actions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220107121215.1912-3-yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Date:   Fri,  7 Jan 2022 20:12:15 +0800
From:   Xin Yin <yinxin.x@...edance.com>
To:     harshadshirwadkar@...il.com, tytso@....edu,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Xin Yin <yinxin.x@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: fast commit may miss file actions

in the follow scenario:
1. jbd start transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some actions and add inode to FC_Q_MAIN fc_q
4. jbd complete transaction n and clear FC_Q_MAIN fc_q
5. task A call fsync

fast commit will lost the file actions during a full commit.

we should also add updates to staging queue during a full commit.
and in ext4_fc_cleanup(), when reset a inode's fc track range, check
it's i_sync_tid, if it bigger than current transaction tid, do not
rest it, or we will lost the track range.

Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@...edance.com>
---
 fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
index 3673d4798af3..4cea92aec7c4 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
@@ -365,7 +365,8 @@ static int ext4_fc_track_template(
 	spin_lock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
 	if (list_empty(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_fc_list))
 		list_add_tail(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_fc_list,
-				(ext4_test_mount_flag(inode->i_sb, EXT4_MF_FC_COMMITTING)) ?
+				(sbi->s_journal->j_flags & JBD2_FULL_COMMIT_ONGOING ||
+				 sbi->s_journal->j_flags & JBD2_FAST_COMMIT_ONGOING) ?
 				&sbi->s_fc_q[FC_Q_STAGING] :
 				&sbi->s_fc_q[FC_Q_MAIN]);
 	spin_unlock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
@@ -418,7 +419,8 @@ static int __track_dentry_update(struct inode *inode, void *arg, bool update)
 	node->fcd_name.len = dentry->d_name.len;
 
 	spin_lock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
-	if (ext4_test_mount_flag(inode->i_sb, EXT4_MF_FC_COMMITTING))
+	if (sbi->s_journal->j_flags & JBD2_FULL_COMMIT_ONGOING ||
+		sbi->s_journal->j_flags & JBD2_FAST_COMMIT_ONGOING)
 		list_add_tail(&node->fcd_list,
 				&sbi->s_fc_dentry_q[FC_Q_STAGING]);
 	else
@@ -1202,7 +1204,8 @@ static void ext4_fc_cleanup(journal_t *journal, int full, tid_t tid)
 		list_del_init(&iter->i_fc_list);
 		ext4_clear_inode_state(&iter->vfs_inode,
 				       EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-		ext4_fc_reset_inode(&iter->vfs_inode);
+		if (iter->i_sync_tid <= tid)
+			ext4_fc_reset_inode(&iter->vfs_inode);
 		/* Make sure EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING bit is clear */
 		smp_mb();
 #if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
-- 
2.20.1