[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1mtk7wsmb.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 09:07:59 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid@...ehiking.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] scsi: Set allocation length to 255 for ATA
Information VPD page
Damien,
> That said, it is weird that scsi_get_vpd_page() does not call
> scsi_device_supports_vpd().
The first patch in the series already makes that change.
I noticed because the allocation for sd_read_cpr() is fairly big so it
stuck out in my test runs while reworking scsi_get_vpd_page().
I didn't remove the conditional in sd_revalidate_disk(). While it is
superfluous, I do like that the "fancy" protocol features are
grouped. Guess we could switch it to a comment instead. I'll think about
it...
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists