linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] signal: strict valid signal check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202201072220.gCthUkw6-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jan 2022 22:14:46 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Ye Guojin <ye.guojin@....com.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     llvm@...ts.linux.dev, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: strict valid signal check

Hi Hongchen,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master hnaz-mm/master v5.16-rc8 next-20220106]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Hongchen-Zhang/signal-strict-valid-signal-check/20220107-124756
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 136057256686de39cc3a07c2e39ef6bc43003ff6
config: hexagon-randconfig-r041-20220107 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220107/202201072220.gCthUkw6-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 32167bfe64a4c5dd4eb3f7a58e24f4cba76f5ac2)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d6ab2033eb509bf064e07f58074e58562098dfcc
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Hongchen-Zhang/signal-strict-valid-signal-check/20220107-124756
        git checkout d6ab2033eb509bf064e07f58074e58562098dfcc
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/tty/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from drivers/tty/tty_io.c:71:
>> include/linux/signal.h:277:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'min' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           return sig <= min(_NSIG, 127) ? 1 : 0;
                         ^
   1 error generated.


vim +/min +277 include/linux/signal.h

   269	
   270	/* Test if 'sig' is valid signal. Use this instead of testing _NSIG directly */
   271	static inline int valid_signal(unsigned long sig)
   272	{
   273		/* max usable signal number is limited by both _NSIG and task's
   274		 * exit_code, and the max available signal number encoded in
   275		 * task's exit_code is 127.
   276		 */
 > 277		return sig <= min(_NSIG, 127) ? 1 : 0;
   278	}
   279	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org