[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=U0-W_H=-u-GDc5GYm8GHSix0F1dKF+3eMNixP30fhtrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 06:57:05 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: qfprom: Increase fuse blow timeout to prevent
write fail.
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:31 PM Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> sc7180 blow fuses got slightly chances to hit qfprom_reg_write timeout.
> Current timeout is simply too low. Since blowing fuses is a
> very rare operation, so the risk associated with overestimating this
> number is low.
> Increase fuse blow timeout from 1ms to 10ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Slight nit that ${SUBJECT} for patches usually doesn't end with a
period. Presumably if Srinivas cares he can fix it while applying.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists