[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220107150242.5019-1-xyz.sun.ok@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:02:42 +0800
From: Xiangyang Zhang <xyz.sun.ok@...il.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, mhiramat@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xyz.sun.ok@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] tracing/kprobes: 'nmissed' not showed correctly for kretprobe
The 'nmissed' column of the 'kprobe_profile' file for kretprobe is
not showed correctly, kretprobe can be skipped by two reasons,
shortage of kretprobe_instance which is counted by tk->rp.nmissed,
and kprobe itself is missed by some reason, so to show the sum.
Fixes: 4a846b443b4e ("tracing/kprobes: Cleanup kprobe tracer code")
Signed-off-by: Xiangyang Zhang <xyz.sun.ok@...il.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index f8c26ee72de3..3d85323278ed 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -1170,15 +1170,18 @@ static int probes_profile_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct dyn_event *ev = v;
struct trace_kprobe *tk;
+ unsigned long nmissed;
if (!is_trace_kprobe(ev))
return 0;
tk = to_trace_kprobe(ev);
+ nmissed = trace_kprobe_is_return(tk) ?
+ tk->rp.kp.nmissed + tk->rp.nmissed : tk->rp.kp.nmissed;
seq_printf(m, " %-44s %15lu %15lu\n",
trace_probe_name(&tk->tp),
trace_kprobe_nhit(tk),
- tk->rp.kp.nmissed);
+ nmissed);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists