[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy0S_uJR7jueEpvwMzt4k6yqh4_pS5qdBwyCTjeNwuLPDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:43:02 +0530
From: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] RISC-V: Avoid using per cpu array for ordered booting
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:01 AM Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org> wrote:
>
> Currently both order booting and spinwait approach uses a per cpu
> array to update stack & task pointer. This approach will not work for the
> following cases.
> 1. If NR_CPUs are configured to be less than highest hart id.
> 2. A platform has sparse hartid.
>
> This issue can be fixed for ordered booting as the booting cpu brings up
> one cpu at a time using SBI HSM extension which has opaque parameter
> that is unused until now.
>
> Introduce a common secondary boot data structure that can store the stack
> and task pointer. Secondary harts will use this data while booting up
> to setup the sp & tp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cpu_ops_sbi.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 3 +++
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu_ops_sbi.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/cpu_ops_sbi.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpu_ops_sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpu_ops_sbi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..90e2219f5eec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpu_ops_sbi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2021 by Rivos Inc.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_CPU_OPS_SBI_H
> +#define __ASM_CPU_OPS_SBI_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/threads.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * struct sbi_hart_boot_data - Hart specific boot used during booting and
> + * cpu hotplug.
> + * @task_ptr: A pointer to the hart specific tp
> + * @stack_ptr: A pointer to the hart specific sp
> + */
> +struct sbi_hart_boot_data {
> + void *task_ptr;
> + void *stack_ptr;
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif /* ifndef __ASM_CPU_OPS_H */
s/__ASM_CPU_OPS_H /__ASM_CPU_OPS_SBI_H/
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index 253126e4beef..df0519a64eaf 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> #include <asm/thread_info.h>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> +#include <asm/cpu_ops_sbi.h>
>
> void asm_offsets(void);
>
> @@ -468,4 +469,6 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
> DEFINE(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK, ALIGN(sizeof(struct pt_regs), STACK_ALIGN));
>
> OFFSET(KERNEL_MAP_VIRT_ADDR, kernel_mapping, virt_addr);
> + OFFSET(SBI_HART_BOOT_TASK_PTR_OFFSET, sbi_hart_boot_data, task_ptr);
> + OFFSET(SBI_HART_BOOT_STACK_PTR_OFFSET, sbi_hart_boot_data, stack_ptr);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu_ops_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu_ops_sbi.c
> index 685fae72b7f5..2e7a9dd9c2a7 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu_ops_sbi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu_ops_sbi.c
> @@ -7,13 +7,22 @@
>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> +#include <asm/cpu_ops_sbi.h>
> #include <asm/sbi.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
>
> extern char secondary_start_sbi[];
> const struct cpu_operations cpu_ops_sbi;
>
> +/*
> + * Ordered booting via HSM brings one cpu at a time. However, cpu hotplug can
> + * be invoked from multiple threads in paralle. Define a per cpu data
s/paralle/parallel/
> + * to handle that.
> + */
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sbi_hart_boot_data, boot_data);
> +
> static int sbi_hsm_hart_start(unsigned long hartid, unsigned long saddr,
> unsigned long priv)
> {
> @@ -58,9 +67,17 @@ static int sbi_cpu_start(unsigned int cpuid, struct task_struct *tidle)
> int rc;
> unsigned long boot_addr = __pa_symbol(secondary_start_sbi);
> int hartid = cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpuid);
> -
> - cpu_update_secondary_bootdata(cpuid, tidle);
> - rc = sbi_hsm_hart_start(hartid, boot_addr, 0);
> + unsigned long hsm_data;
> + struct sbi_hart_boot_data *bdata = &per_cpu(boot_data, cpuid);
> +
> + /* Make sure tidle is updated */
> + smp_mb();
> + bdata->task_ptr = tidle;
> + bdata->stack_ptr = task_stack_page(tidle) + THREAD_SIZE;
> + /* Make sure boot data is updated */
> + smp_mb();
> + hsm_data = __pa(bdata);
> + rc = sbi_hsm_hart_start(hartid, boot_addr, hsm_data);
No need for the rc variable here.
>
> return rc;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
> index f52f01ecbeea..40d4c625513c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> #include <asm/csr.h>
> +#include <asm/cpu_ops_sbi.h>
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> #include <asm/image.h>
> #include "efi-header.S"
> @@ -167,15 +168,15 @@ secondary_start_sbi:
> la a3, .Lsecondary_park
> csrw CSR_TVEC, a3
>
> - slli a3, a0, LGREG
> - la a4, __cpu_up_stack_pointer
> - XIP_FIXUP_OFFSET a4
> - la a5, __cpu_up_task_pointer
> - XIP_FIXUP_OFFSET a5
> - add a4, a3, a4
> - add a5, a3, a5
> - REG_L sp, (a4)
> - REG_L tp, (a5)
> + /* a0 contains the hartid & a1 contains boot data */
> + li a2, SBI_HART_BOOT_TASK_PTR_OFFSET
> + XIP_FIXUP_OFFSET a2
> + add a2, a2, a1
> + REG_L tp, (a2)
> + li a3, SBI_HART_BOOT_STACK_PTR_OFFSET
> + XIP_FIXUP_OFFSET a3
> + add a3, a3, a1
> + REG_L sp, (a3)
>
> .global secondary_start_common
> secondary_start_common:
> --
> 2.33.1
>
Apart from minor nits above, this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Regards,
Anup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists