lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1126ce91-f22b-c397-4d1e-13d290a424a5@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:51:21 +0100
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To:     Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     workflows@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] docs: add a document about regression handling

On 07.01.22 16:37, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 07/01/2022 15:21, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Create a document explaining various aspects around regression handling
>> and tracking both for users and developers. Among others describe the
>> first rule of Linux kernel development and what it means in practice.
>> Also explain what a regression actually is and how to report one
>> properly. The text additionally provides a brief introduction to the bot
>> the kernel's regression tracker uses to facilitate his work. To sum
>> things up, provide a few quotes from Linus to show how serious he takes
>> regressions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
> [...]
>> +The important bits for people fixing regressions
>> +================================================
>> +
>> +When receiving regression reports by mail, check if the reporter CCed
>> `the
>> +regression mailing list <https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/>`_
>> +(regressions@...ts.linux.dev). If not, forward or bounce the report
>> to the Linux
>> +kernel's regression tracker (regressions@...mhuis.info), unless you
>> plan on
> 
> I would have expected it to be the same mailing list
> (regressions@...ts.linux.dev), is this a typo maybe?

Thx for taking a look. Hmm. That's possible, but I (and the grep call I
just ran) fail to spot the typo.

Maybe the wording is to confusing: regressions@...ts.linux.dev is the
list, regressions@...mhuis.info is a dedicated email address I (the
kernel's regression tracker) use for regression tracking (which reminds
me: maybe I should ask for a alias like regressions@...nel.org or
regression-tracker@...nel.org).

Ciao, Thorsten

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ