lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 07 Jan 2022 13:02:19 -0600
From:   "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
        Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] exit: Move oops specific logic from do_exit into
 make_task_dead

Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:48:08AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 02:25:25PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > The beginning of do_exit has become cluttered and difficult to read as
>> > it is filled with checks to handle things that can only happen when
>> > the kernel is operating improperly.
>> > 
>> > Now that we have a dedicated function for cleaning up a task when the
>> > kernel is operating improperly move the checks there.
>> 
>> Umm...  I would probably take profile_task_exit() crap out before that
>> point.
>> 	1) the damn thing is dead - nothing registers notifiers there
>> 	2) blocking_notifier_call_chain() is not a nice thing to do on oops...
>> 
>> I'll post a patch ripping the dead parts of kernel/profile.c out tomorrow
>> morning (there's also profile_handoff_task(), equally useless these days
>> and complicating things for __put_task_struct()).
>
> Argh...  OK, so your subsequent series had pretty much the same thing.
> My apologies - still digging myself out from mail pile that had accumulated
> over two months ;-/

No worries.  I really appreciate getting some detail review.  Some
things just take another set of eyes to spot.

Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ