linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc: Fix virt_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09ed46a5-6df3-ffc0-8243-61612c06153a@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 Jan 2022 19:58:04 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        "Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>,
        <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
CC:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc: Fix virt_addr_valid() check

Hi PPC maintainers， ping..

On 2021/12/25 20:06, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> When run ethtool eth0, the BUG occurred,
>
>    usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object not in SLUB page?! (offset 0, size 1048)!
>    kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:99
>    ...
>    usercopy_abort+0x64/0xa0 (unreliable)
>    __check_heap_object+0x168/0x190
>    __check_object_size+0x1a0/0x200
>    dev_ethtool+0x2494/0x2b20
>    dev_ioctl+0x5d0/0x770
>    sock_do_ioctl+0xf0/0x1d0
>    sock_ioctl+0x3ec/0x5a0
>    __se_sys_ioctl+0xf0/0x160
>    system_call_exception+0xfc/0x1f0
>    system_call_common+0xf8/0x200
>
> The code shows below,
>
>    data = vzalloc(array_size(gstrings.len, ETH_GSTRING_LEN));
>    copy_to_user(useraddr, data, gstrings.len * ETH_GSTRING_LEN))
>
> The data is alloced by vmalloc(), virt_addr_valid(ptr) will return true
> on PowerPC64, which leads to the panic.
>
> As commit 4dd7554a6456 ("powerpc/64: Add VIRTUAL_BUG_ON checks for __va
> and __pa addresses") does, make sure the virt addr above PAGE_OFFSET in
> the virt_addr_valid().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h | 5 ++++-
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
> index 254687258f42..300d4c105a3a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -132,7 +132,10 @@ static inline bool pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
>   #define virt_to_page(kaddr)	pfn_to_page(virt_to_pfn(kaddr))
>   #define pfn_to_kaddr(pfn)	__va((pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)
>   
> -#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr)	pfn_valid(virt_to_pfn(kaddr))
> +#define virt_addr_valid(vaddr)	({						\
> +	unsigned long _addr = (unsigned long)vaddr;				\
> +	(unsigned long)(_addr) >= PAGE_OFFSET && pfn_valid(virt_to_pfn(_addr));	\
> +})
>   
>   /*
>    * On Book-E parts we need __va to parse the device tree and we can't