[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220108205319.2046348-10-liambeguin@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 15:53:12 -0500
From: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>
To: liambeguin@...il.com, peda@...ntia.se, jic23@...nel.org,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, lars@...afoo.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v12 09/16] iio: afe: rescale: fix accuracy for small fractional scales
The approximation caused by integer divisions can be costly on smaller
scale values since the decimal part is significant compared to the
integer part. Switch to an IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO scale type in such
cases to maintain accuracy.
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
---
drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
index 68eb3e341939..ed3ef994997f 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ int rescale_process_scale(struct rescale *rescale, int scale_type,
int *val, int *val2)
{
s64 tmp;
- s32 rem;
+ s32 rem, rem2;
u32 mult;
u32 neg;
@@ -43,9 +43,23 @@ int rescale_process_scale(struct rescale *rescale, int scale_type,
tmp = (s64)*val * 1000000000LL;
tmp = div_s64(tmp, rescale->denominator);
tmp *= rescale->numerator;
- tmp = div_s64(tmp, 1000000000LL);
+
+ tmp = div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000LL, &rem);
*val = tmp;
- return scale_type;
+
+ if (!rem)
+ return scale_type;
+
+ tmp = 1 << *val2;
+
+ rem2 = *val % (int)tmp;
+ *val = *val / (int)tmp;
+
+ *val2 = rem / (int)tmp;
+ if (rem2)
+ *val2 += div_s64((s64)rem2 * 1000000000LL, tmp);
+
+ return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO:
case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:
mult = scale_type == IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO ? GIGA : MEGA;
--
2.34.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists