[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <333385690.14559.1641604090435.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:08:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
paulmck <paulmck@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
carlos <carlos@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rseq: x86: implement abort-at-ip extension
----- On Jan 7, 2022, at 5:27 PM, David Laight David.Laight@...LAB.COM wrote:
>> That being said, there might be an architecture agnostic alternative available.
>> On abort of a RSEQ_CS_FLAG_ABORT_AT_IP critical section, we could let the kernel
>> decrement/increment the stack pointer to make room for a pointer (depending if
>> the
>> stack grows down or up). It would then store the abort-at-ip value at the top of
>> stack.
>
> Stack redzone in a leaf function?
Good point!
For x86-64 for instance, which has a redzone of 128 bytes, there are a few alternatives.
On abort:
Approach A) Move the stack pointer as little as possible
1. On abort in kernel:
1.1 Subtract 8 bytes from the stack pointer
1.2 Store the abort-at-ip value at stack pointer - 128
2. In abort handler (userspace)
2.1 user-space knows that it can find the abort-at-ip value at stack pointer - 128
2.2 after using that value, the abort handler needs to add 8 bytes to the stack pointer
Approach B) Move the stack pointer to skip the entire redzone
1. On abort in kernel:
1.1 Subtract 128 bytes from the stack pointer
1.2 Store the abort-at-ip value at stack pointer - 8 (basically within a new red zone)
2. In abort handler (userspace)
2.1 user-space knows that it can find the abort-at-ip value at stack pointer - 8
2.2 after using that value, the abort handler needs to add 128 bytes to the stack pointer
I suspect both approaches should work.
Any preference or other ideas ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT,
> UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists