[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220110042406.499429-5-willy@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 04:23:42 +0000
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/28] gup: Optimise compound_range_next()
By definition, a compound page has an order >= 1, so the second half
of the test was redundant. Also, this cannot be a tail page since
it's the result of calling compound_head(), so use PageHead() instead
of PageCompound().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
---
mm/gup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 3c93d2fdf4da..6eedca605b3d 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static inline struct page *compound_range_next(unsigned long i,
next = start + i;
page = compound_head(next);
- if (PageCompound(page) && compound_order(page) >= 1)
+ if (PageHead(page))
nr = min_t(unsigned int,
page + compound_nr(page) - next, npages - i);
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists