[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdyOFd8JJHbm1W+m@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:50:45 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vineet Singh <vineet.singh@...el.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 48/48] perf cpumap: Give CPUs their own type.
Em Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 10:13:51PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> A common problem is confusing CPU map indices with the CPU, by wrapping
> the CPU with a struct then this is avoided. This approach is similar to
> atomic_t.
This one needed this to build with BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1, please check, I'll
soon push this to tmp.perf/perf_cpu so that you can take a look and test
it.
- Arnaldo
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
index 80d1a3a31052fe55..328479df5e16a638 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static int bperf__load(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target)
filter_type == BPERF_FILTER_TGID)
key = evsel->core.threads->map[i].pid;
else if (filter_type == BPERF_FILTER_CPU)
- key = evsel->core.cpus->map[i];
+ key = evsel->core.cpus->map[i].cpu;
else
break;
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int bperf_sync_counters(struct evsel *evsel)
num_cpu = all_cpu_map->nr;
for (i = 0; i < num_cpu; i++) {
- cpu = all_cpu_map->map[i];
+ cpu = all_cpu_map->map[i].cpu;
bperf_trigger_reading(evsel->bperf_leader_prog_fd, cpu);
}
return 0;
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int bperf__disable(struct evsel *evsel)
static int bperf__read(struct evsel *evsel)
{
struct bperf_follower_bpf *skel = evsel->follower_skel;
- __u32 num_cpu_bpf = cpu__max_cpu();
+ __u32 num_cpu_bpf = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
struct bpf_perf_event_value values[num_cpu_bpf];
int reading_map_fd, err = 0;
__u32 i;
@@ -615,6 +615,7 @@ static int bperf__read(struct evsel *evsel)
reading_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.accum_readings);
for (i = 0; i < bpf_map__max_entries(skel->maps.accum_readings); i++) {
+ struct perf_cpu entry;
__u32 cpu;
err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(reading_map_fd, &i, values);
@@ -624,14 +625,15 @@ static int bperf__read(struct evsel *evsel)
case BPERF_FILTER_GLOBAL:
assert(i == 0);
- perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, j, all_cpu_map) {
+ perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(entry, j, all_cpu_map) {
+ cpu = entry.cpu;
perf_counts(evsel->counts, cpu, 0)->val = values[cpu].counter;
perf_counts(evsel->counts, cpu, 0)->ena = values[cpu].enabled;
perf_counts(evsel->counts, cpu, 0)->run = values[cpu].running;
}
break;
case BPERF_FILTER_CPU:
- cpu = evsel->core.cpus->map[i];
+ cpu = evsel->core.cpus->map[i].cpu;
perf_counts(evsel->counts, i, 0)->val = values[cpu].counter;
perf_counts(evsel->counts, i, 0)->ena = values[cpu].enabled;
perf_counts(evsel->counts, i, 0)->run = values[cpu].running;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
index cbc6c2bca488f6bf..631e34a0b66ff084 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static int bperf_load_program(struct evlist *evlist)
struct cgroup *cgrp, *leader_cgrp;
__u32 i, cpu;
__u32 nr_cpus = evlist->core.all_cpus->nr;
- int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu();
+ int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
int map_size, map_fd;
int prog_fd, err;
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int bperf_load_program(struct evlist *evlist)
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
int fd = FD(evsel, cpu);
__u32 idx = evsel->core.idx * total_cpus +
- evlist->core.all_cpus->map[cpu];
+ evlist->core.all_cpus->map[cpu].cpu;
err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &idx, &fd,
BPF_ANY);
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__sync_counters(struct evlist *evlist)
int prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.trigger_read);
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
- cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i];
+ cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i].cpu;
bperf_trigger_reading(prog_fd, cpu);
}
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__read(struct evsel *evsel)
{
struct evlist *evlist = evsel->evlist;
int i, cpu, nr_cpus = evlist->core.all_cpus->nr;
- int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu();
+ int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
struct perf_counts_values *counts;
struct bpf_perf_event_value *values;
int reading_map_fd, err = 0;
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__read(struct evsel *evsel)
}
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
- cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i];
+ cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i].cpu;
counts = perf_counts(evsel->counts, i, 0);
counts->val = values[cpu].counter;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_ftrace.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_ftrace.c
index 28dc4c60c7884818..d756cc66eef32ae8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_ftrace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_ftrace.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ int perf_ftrace__latency_prepare_bpf(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace)
fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.cpu_filter);
for (i = 0; i < ncpus; i++) {
- cpu = perf_cpu_map__cpu(ftrace->evlist->core.cpus, i);
+ cpu = perf_cpu_map__cpu(ftrace->evlist->core.cpus, i).cpu;
bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &cpu, &val, BPF_ANY);
}
}
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int perf_ftrace__latency_read_bpf(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace __maybe_unused,
int i, fd, err;
u32 idx;
u64 *hist;
- int ncpus = cpu__max_cpu();
+ int ncpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.latency);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists