linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 01/40] x86/compressed/64: detect/setup SEV/SME features earlier in boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YdyihO2pEE/MWsIT@dt>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:17:56 -0600
From:   Venu Busireddy <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>
To:     Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc:     Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/40] x86/compressed/64: detect/setup SEV/SME
 features earlier in boot

On 2022-01-10 14:46:27 -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Hi Venu,
> 
> On 1/5/22 1:34 PM, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 1/3/22 1:10 PM, Venu Busireddy wrote:
> > > On 2021-12-15 15:22:57 -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:38:55PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > But it is hard to discuss anything without patches so we can continue
> > > > > the topic with concrete patches. But this unification is not
> > > > > super-pressing so it can go ontop of the SNP pile.
> > > > 
> > > > Yah, it's all theoretical at this point. Didn't mean to derail things
> > > > though. I mainly brought it up to suggest that Venu's original
> > > > approach of
> > > > returning the encryption bit via a pointer argument might make
> > > > it easier to
> > > > expand it for other purposes in the future, and that naming it for that
> > > > future purpose might encourage future developers to focus their efforts
> > > > there instead of potentially re-introducing duplicate code.
> > > > 
> > > > But either way it's simple enough to rework things when we actually
> > > > cross that bridge. So totally fine with saving all of this as a future
> > > > follow-up, or picking up either of Venu's patches for now if you'd still
> > > > prefer.
> > > 
> > > So, what is the consensus? Do you want me to submit a patch after the
> > > SNP changes go upstream? Or, do you want to roll in one of the patches
> > > that I posted earlier?
> > > 
> > 
> > Will incorporate your changes in v9. And will see what others say about it.
> > 
> 
> Now that I am incorporating the feedback in my wip branch, at this time I am
> dropping your cleanup mainly because some of recommendation may require more
> rework down the line; you can submit your recommendation as cleanup after
> the patches are in. I hope this is okay with you.

Can't we do that rework (if any) as and when it is needed? I am worried
that we will never get this in!

Venu