[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82083174-fccb-a9e2-616f-7a706958e2da@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:13:45 -0600
From: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Alistar Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au>
Cc: linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
On 12/6/21 21:38, Joel Stanley wrote:
> In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
> removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
> put indirect scom.
>
> For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
> caller to decide to retry.
>
> This removes the following special case which would have caused the
> retry code to return early:
>
> - if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
> - return 0;
>
> I believe this case is handled.
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> ---
> drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c | 41 +++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c
> index 3b427f7e9027..bcb756dc9866 100644
> --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c
> +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-scom.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int put_indirect_scom_form0(struct scom_device *scom, uint64_t value,
> uint64_t addr, uint32_t *status)
> {
> uint64_t ind_data, ind_addr;
> - int rc, retries, err = 0;
> + int rc, err;
>
> if (value & ~XSCOM_DATA_IND_DATA)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -156,19 +156,14 @@ static int put_indirect_scom_form0(struct scom_device *scom, uint64_t value,
> if (rc || (*status & SCOM_STATUS_ANY_ERR))
> return rc;
>
> - for (retries = 0; retries < SCOM_MAX_IND_RETRIES; retries++) {
> - rc = __get_scom(scom, &ind_data, addr, status);
> - if (rc || (*status & SCOM_STATUS_ANY_ERR))
> - return rc;
> + rc = __get_scom(scom, &ind_data, addr, status);
> + if (rc || (*status & SCOM_STATUS_ANY_ERR))
> + return rc;
>
> - err = (ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_ERR_MASK) >> XSCOM_DATA_IND_ERR_SHIFT;
> - *status = err << SCOM_STATUS_PIB_RESP_SHIFT;
> - if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
> - return 0;
> + err = (ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_ERR_MASK) >> XSCOM_DATA_IND_ERR_SHIFT;
> + *status = err << SCOM_STATUS_PIB_RESP_SHIFT;
>
> - msleep(1);
> - }
> - return rc;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int put_indirect_scom_form1(struct scom_device *scom, uint64_t value,
> @@ -188,7 +183,7 @@ static int get_indirect_scom_form0(struct scom_device *scom, uint64_t *value,
> uint64_t addr, uint32_t *status)
> {
> uint64_t ind_data, ind_addr;
> - int rc, retries, err = 0;
> + int rc, err;
>
> ind_addr = addr & XSCOM_ADDR_DIRECT_PART;
> ind_data = (addr & XSCOM_ADDR_INDIRECT_PART) | XSCOM_DATA_IND_READ;
> @@ -196,21 +191,15 @@ static int get_indirect_scom_form0(struct scom_device *scom, uint64_t *value,
> if (rc || (*status & SCOM_STATUS_ANY_ERR))
> return rc;
>
> - for (retries = 0; retries < SCOM_MAX_IND_RETRIES; retries++) {
> - rc = __get_scom(scom, &ind_data, addr, status);
> - if (rc || (*status & SCOM_STATUS_ANY_ERR))
> - return rc;
> -
> - err = (ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_ERR_MASK) >> XSCOM_DATA_IND_ERR_SHIFT;
> - *status = err << SCOM_STATUS_PIB_RESP_SHIFT;
> - *value = ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_DATA;
> + rc = __get_scom(scom, &ind_data, addr, status);
> + if (rc || (*status & SCOM_STATUS_ANY_ERR))
> + return rc;
>
> - if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
> - return 0;
> + err = (ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_ERR_MASK) >> XSCOM_DATA_IND_ERR_SHIFT;
> + *status = err << SCOM_STATUS_PIB_RESP_SHIFT;
> + *value = ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_DATA;
>
> - msleep(1);
> - }
> - return rc;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int raw_put_scom(struct scom_device *scom, uint64_t value,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists